Many different characters in this play are persuaded to do things they would not do of their own accord. What are some of these instances, and how does persuasion affect the course of the plot?
When Hero and Margret spoke of Benedict's secret affection towards Beatrice and Don Pedro, Claudio and Leonato speaking likewise of Beatrice in 'convenient' hearing distance of them both was a form of persuasion. In this example, persuasion has been stemmed from deception. The persistant talk of their overwhelming secret intimate feeling towards each other evoke a responding emotion they claimed as 'love', having been convinced by as reliabie an evidence as gossip would allow. Additionally, the example of Claudio and Don John being convinced of Hero's unfaithfulness. Unlike Benedict and Beatrices case, Doh John had the benefit of audible aid and to some extent visual as well to further convince them of Hero dishonesty.
The persuasion of Leonato of Hero's innocence is a subtle however, different take on persuasion being stemmed from something other than deception. Here, it focuses mainly on gender ininquality. Hero wasnt givenb the priledge to defend herself because Leonato wouldnt listen but Frair Francis insisted in her to voice her innocence. Had it not been through the Friar Francis, Hero would never had gotten the opportunity to plea her innocence and persuade her father of it. This form of persuasion was responsible for the trun of events in the latter regions of the play.
Conclusively speaking, persuasion plays an intricate role in the play 'Much Ado About Nothing'. Unique to this play, it ir partially if not completely responsiblke for the plot and the turn of events thereof.